Skip to main content


         This documentation site is for previous versions. Visit our new documentation site for current releases.      
 

AML CDD profile assessment

Updated on February 16, 2021

During the due diligence preparation for a given customer, the system executes a series of rules to determine the AML CDD profile. The profile assigned to each customer determines the content and applicability of the KYC questionnaires that the customer must answer.

The application manages the following profiles:

Contracting party (Main customer)

Profile namePurpose
Simplified Due Diligence (CPSDD)Simplified version of the standard due diligence for contracting parties
Standard Due Diligence (CPFDD)Complete, standard diligence for contracting parties
Enhanced Due Diligence (CPEDD)Enhanced due diligence applied for contracting parties
No Due Diligence (NoDD)Exempt from due diligence questioning

Controlling party (Relevant related party)

Profile namePurpose
Simplified Due Diligence (RPSDD)Simplified version of the standard due diligence for related parties
Standard Due Diligence (RPFDD)Complete, standard diligence for related parties
Enhanced Due Diligence (RPEDD)Enhanced due diligence applied for related parties
No Due Diligence (NoDD)Exempt from due diligence questioning

At the time of creating the KYC cases for a given party, Pega Client Lifecycle Management for Financial Services uses the AML profile to determine whether the cases must be created (SDD, FDD, and EDD profiles), or not (NoDD).

During creating a new case, the system automatically transfers the AML profile information to the KYC engine to configure the applicable KYC types for that case, and show and hide questions according to the profile. For example, an SDD form is a leaner version of the FDD form and skips more than half of the FDD questions. For more information, see KYC due diligence profile.

Have a question? Get answers now.

Visit the Support Center to ask questions, engage in discussions, share ideas, and help others.

Did you find this content helpful?

Want to help us improve this content?

We'd prefer it if you saw us at our best.

Pega.com is not optimized for Internet Explorer. For the optimal experience, please use:

Close Deprecation Notice
Contact us