Skip to main content

Resolved Issues

View the resolved issues for a specific Platform release.

Go to download resolved issues by patch release.

Browse release notes for a selected Pega Version.

NOTE: Enter just the Case ID number (SR or INC) in order to find the associated Support Request.

Please note: beginning with the Pega Platform 8.7.4 Patch, the Resolved Issues have moved to the Support Center.

SR-D38492 · Issue 505491

Batching now enabled when using IH Summary shape in substrategies

Resolved in Pega Version 8.1.7

Batching was not being enabled when using IH Summary shape in substrategies. This was traced to the IH_SUMMARY_CACHE field not automatically being passed to sub-strategies, and has been corrected.

SR-D48881 · Issue 514602

Corrected alignment of column header and content when fixed header is used

Resolved in Pega Version 8.1.7

The tables header column was misaligned with the context columns when a fixed header was used. This has been resolved by correcting the code calculating the width of the header cells.

SR-D26133 · Issue 500723

Corrected alignment of column header and content when fixed header is used

Resolved in Pega Version 8.1.7

The tables header column was misaligned with the context columns when a fixed header was used. This has been resolved by correcting the code calculating the width of the header cells.

SR-D28898 · Issue 501653

Corrected alignment of column header and content when fixed header is used

Resolved in Pega Version 8.1.7

The tables header column was misaligned with the context columns when a fixed header was used. This has been resolved by correcting the code calculating the width of the header cells.

SR-D42583 · Issue 514488

Label of a field is correctly rendered when a section is re-used with a visiblity condition

Resolved in Pega Version 8.1.7

The label of a field was not being rendered/visible when a section with a 'visible when' condition was re-used in different Page Contexts. The label was displayed correctly if 'Run visibility condition on client' was checked. As part of performance improvements made in a previous version, label generation was moved under the dlcellvisibility flag. Because of this, if a section was re-used at multiple places with different contexts and one place had visibility false and another had visibility true, the labels were not getting generated for the visible section. To resolve this, Label Generation has been moved out of dlcellVisibility to ensure label metadata will always be generated. Updated performance improvements have been made instead by way of a DSS setting (generateCellMetadata) so that when generateCellMetadata is true, the label generation will honor dlcellvisibility to generate the label metadata.

SR-D39956 · Issue 511639

Corrected method IF use with shortcut function

Resolved in Pega Version 8.1.7

After upgrade, method IF was not working as expected when used in an expression like "@if(.totalorders_120days>0,(.remakeorders_120days/.totalorders_120days)<0.3,false)". This was caused by a missed use case for the combination of an exception-generating function in combination with a shortcut function (i.e. ternary, and, or), and has been resolved.

SR-D39547 · Issue 505859

Check added for backwards compatibility with Case Type when rules

Resolved in Pega Version 8.1.7

After upgrade, the When rules present on case type rules (used for skipping stages or showing/hiding stage-wide or case-wide actions) were not executing at run time. This was traced to the introduction of the pySkipOrAllowType property in recent versions, and was only reproducible when the ApplicationRuleset was locked and after upgrade irrespective of whether the condition for when was true or false. To resolve this and enhance backwards capability, a check has been added for the SkipOrAllowType property being empty.

SR-D51554 · Issue 514064

Local UUID cache will be updated when merge event is detected

Resolved in Pega Version 8.1.7

Cluster-related issues were seen in multiple production clusters. For some nodes in the cluster the Cluster Management screen showed all expected nodes with valid Node IDs displayed, and on other nodes the Cluster Management screen showed the node ID of itself, SERVER@localhost:5701. On an impacted node displaying the wrong ID, the Node Information landing page did not work and displayed the error "Unable to execute job on ." Multiple advanced agents running on nodes in the affected clusters, both with correct and incorrect IDs, also failed with a similar error "Unable to execute job on <node's job id>". This was traced to a merge performed after a split brain. To resolve this, the code has been updated to handle merge events: when the node UUID is changed as part of a split brain recovery, the local UUID cache will be updated when the merge event is detected.

SR-D42159 · Issue 508942

Large report pagination should use "Previous and Next only"

Resolved in Pega Version 8.1.7

Some Report Definitions were getting timed out or facing gateway exceptions, primarily due to high time consumed by the DB Queries. Investigation showed the total result count process appeared to stop at the configured pyMaxRecords value as long as it was nonzero. This indicated the issue was related to changes made to fix the inaccurate behavior of the "Last" button in the responsive paginator which included removing logic that set pyMaxRecords to anything other than zero. To resolve this issue, those pagination changes have been reverted. The "Last" button should not be used when the paging mode is set to Numeric: in the case of large reports, the paging option should be set to "Previous and Next only".

SR-D42670 · Issue 510185

Force order added to inner join when running a Rules Resolution filter

Resolved in Pega Version 8.1.7

After upgrade, D_getResolvedWorkStatuses was not loading properly due to a Report Definition that used a Filter by Rule Resolution option timing out on the SQL Server. When the Filter by Rule Resolution option is selected in RD, it will generate a rule resolution query with an inner join which can cause a time out on the SQL Server while it tries to find out the join order for tables with multiple joins. To resolve this, the SQL server will provide a Force order, merge inner join hint option by way of an added DSS reporting/useForceOrderHint. Additionally, reporting/useMergeHintForRRquery should be set on Pega-Reporting to set things up for using the Merge Inner join hint in the query.

We'd prefer it if you saw us at our best.

Pega.com is not optimized for Internet Explorer. For the optimal experience, please use:

Close Deprecation Notice
Contact us