INC-217855 · Issue 731911
Uncommitted hotfix able to Rollback All after install
Resolved in Pega Version 8.8
A security hotfix was installed through Hotfix manager and left as uncommitted. When new hotfixes for the same files were received, the process required the uncommitted hotfixes to be rolled back, but attempting to do so generated exceptions in the logs reading "Exception in rolling back the archive PegaRULES Process Commander: code: 0 SQLState: Message: java.sql.SQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException: ORA-00001: unique constraint (PRPC_RULE_ADM_P7.PR_ENGINECLASSES_PK) violated". The issue was caused by the Date field only accepting dd/mm/yyyy HH:MI:SS, so attempting to insert two records of the same jar in the pr_engineclass generated this error from pr_data_restore in Oracle. To resolve this, an update has been made to insert rolled-back jar removals with their original patch date to avoid PK conflicts.
INC-225687 · Issue 739708
Handling added to avoid incorrect true value for DateTimeisPastOrFuture
Resolved in Pega Version 8.8
When the Function pxDateTimeisPastOrFuture() was called with the arguments "" (the empty String) and "false", it sometimes returned "true" instead of "false". This function internally calls the Function CompareDates() which takes two Strings as arguments. In this case, one is provided by the caller of pxDateTimeisPastOrFuture, the other one is generated at runtime, as the current date/time. As the second argument of pxDateTimeisPastOrFuture, the generated date/time will be the first parameter, while the second one is the date/time argument for pxDateTimeisPastOrFuture. If that argument is the empty String, is will be replaced by the current date/time. This means that the value for the second parameter is determined after the first parameter and that can result in a gap in time by a few milliseconds. This in turn results in "true" as the return value for pxDateTimeisPastOrFuture. This has been resolved by adding handling for a blank string so "false" is returned correctly.
INC-196389 · Issue 690786
ConfigurationReconciliationTask updated for greater compatibility
Resolved in Pega Version 8.7
After updating from Pega 8.3 to Pega 8.6, models which previously had learning and performance AUC greater than 0.7 reported an AUC of 0.5. This was traced to the update handling in ConfigurationReconciliationTask. AdmRuleBrowser does not perform ruleset resolution, so all rules were returned, for example the rule for model A in both the 08-01 and 08-03 ruleset. The system then iterated over all of the adaptive model rules returned by AdmRuleBrowser in order to assess whether a configuration update was necessary. The condition to update the model rule was met when either the config key did not exist (indicating a newly added configuration) or the model rule was "old" (version <2). For models generated in Pega 8.3 or earlier the version number for all rules must be 1, and the update to Pega 8.6 therefore caused the ConfigurationReconciliationTask to be applied to all adaptive model rules. To resolve this, the configuration update check in ConfigurationReconciliationTask has been removed.
INC-201335 · Issue 690733
ConfigurationReconciliationTask updated for greater compatibility
Resolved in Pega Version 8.7
After updating from Pega 8.3 to Pega 8.6, models which previously had learning and performance AUC greater than 0.7 reported an AUC of 0.5. This was traced to the update handling in ConfigurationReconciliationTask. AdmRuleBrowser does not perform ruleset resolution, so all rules were returned, for example the rule for model A in both the 08-01 and 08-03 ruleset. The system then iterated over all of the adaptive model rules returned by AdmRuleBrowser in order to assess whether a configuration update was necessary. The condition to update the model rule was met when either the config key did not exist (indicating a newly added configuration) or the model rule was "old" (version <2). For models generated in Pega 8.3 or earlier the version number for all rules must be 1, and the update to Pega 8.6 therefore caused the ConfigurationReconciliationTask to be applied to all adaptive model rules. To resolve this, the configuration update check in ConfigurationReconciliationTask has been removed.
INC-194415 · Issue 710824
Improvements for dirty popup
Resolved in Pega Version 8.7.2
Multiple issues have been addressed for dirty popups. 1) While working on an assignment, making a change and then clicking on the left navigation (Home, Dashboard) did not show the dirty pop up as expected, and the change was lost. The dirty pop up did appear on the Cancel button and Actions within the case. This has been resolved by improving the context switching for visibility of the dirty pop up. 2) Attempting to work around the previous issue by clicking "Do not display dirty warnings" only worked the first time it was tried. With this change in place, opening the assignment, making a change, then clicking Home, caused the pop up to appear as desired, but opening the assignment again and making a change, then clicking Home again did not prompt the dirty pop up. This was due to the click handler getting hit twice, leading to the already open dirty dialog being closed during the second call to the function 'isFormDirty' in pzpega_ui_doc_actionRouter.js file, and this has been resolved. 3) When attempting to close the case as a draft, clicking the save button caused the system to keep loading for a few minutes without sign of completing the save process and eventually the browser had to be closed. The content was saved, but the system was not able end the loading screen. This was caused by an incorrect harness context which caused the "SubmitInProgress" flag to be true on the incorrect harness context so the modal was not dismissed. To resolve this, on clicking the "Save" button, after the confirmation modal is closed, the pega.u.d.isDirtyDialogOpen will be reset to false.
INC-211253 · Issue 711279
Improvements for dirty popup
Resolved in Pega Version 8.7.2
Multiple issues have been addressed for dirty popups. 1) While working on an assignment, making a change and then clicking on the left navigation (Home, Dashboard) did not show the dirty pop up as expected, and the change was lost. The dirty pop up did appear on the Cancel button and Actions within the case. This has been resolved by improving the context switching for visibility of the dirty pop up. 2) Attempting to work around the previous issue by clicking "Do not display dirty warnings" only worked the first time it was tried. With this change in place, opening the assignment, making a change, then clicking Home, caused the pop up to appear as desired, but opening the assignment again and making a change, then clicking Home again did not prompt the dirty pop up. This was due to the click handler getting hit twice, leading to the already open dirty dialog being closed during the second call to the function 'isFormDirty' in pzpega_ui_doc_actionRouter.js file, and this has been resolved. 3) When attempting to close the case as a draft, clicking the save button caused the system to keep loading for a few minutes without sign of completing the save process and eventually the browser had to be closed. The content was saved, but the system was not able end the loading screen. This was caused by an incorrect harness context which caused the "SubmitInProgress" flag to be true on the incorrect harness context so the modal was not dismissed. To resolve this, on clicking the "Save" button, after the confirmation modal is closed, the pega.u.d.isDirtyDialogOpen will be reset to false.
INC-194415 · Issue 710825
Improvements for dirty popup
Resolved in Pega Version 8.8
Multiple issues have been addressed for dirty popups. 1) While working on an assignment, making a change and then clicking on the left navigation (Home, Dashboard) did not show the dirty pop up as expected, and the change was lost. The dirty pop up did appear on the Cancel button and Actions within the case. This has been resolved by improving the context switching for visibility of the dirty pop up. 2) Attempting to work around the previous issue by clicking "Do not display dirty warnings" only worked the first time it was tried. With this change in place, opening the assignment, making a change, then clicking Home, caused the pop up to appear as desired, but opening the assignment again and making a change, then clicking Home again did not prompt the dirty pop up. This was due to the click handler getting hit twice, leading to the already open dirty dialog being closed during the second call to the function 'isFormDirty' in pzpega_ui_doc_actionRouter.js file, and this has been resolved. 3) When attempting to close the case as a draft, clicking the save button caused the system to keep loading for a few minutes without sign of completing the save process and eventually the browser had to be closed. The content was saved, but the system was not able end the loading screen. This was caused by an incorrect harness context which caused the "SubmitInProgress" flag to be true on the incorrect harness context so the modal was not dismissed. To resolve this, on clicking the "Save" button, after the confirmation modal is closed, the pega.u.d.isDirtyDialogOpen will be reset to false.
INC-211253 · Issue 711280
Improvements for dirty popup
Resolved in Pega Version 8.8
Multiple issues have been addressed for dirty popups. 1) While working on an assignment, making a change and then clicking on the left navigation (Home, Dashboard) did not show the dirty pop up as expected, and the change was lost. The dirty pop up did appear on the Cancel button and Actions within the case. This has been resolved by improving the context switching for visibility of the dirty pop up. 2) Attempting to work around the previous issue by clicking "Do not display dirty warnings" only worked the first time it was tried. With this change in place, opening the assignment, making a change, then clicking Home, caused the pop up to appear as desired, but opening the assignment again and making a change, then clicking Home again did not prompt the dirty pop up. This was due to the click handler getting hit twice, leading to the already open dirty dialog being closed during the second call to the function 'isFormDirty' in pzpega_ui_doc_actionRouter.js file, and this has been resolved. 3) When attempting to close the case as a draft, clicking the save button caused the system to keep loading for a few minutes without sign of completing the save process and eventually the browser had to be closed. The content was saved, but the system was not able end the loading screen. This was caused by an incorrect harness context which caused the "SubmitInProgress" flag to be true on the incorrect harness context so the modal was not dismissed. To resolve this, on clicking the "Save" button, after the confirmation modal is closed, the pega.u.d.isDirtyDialogOpen will be reset to false.