Skip to main content

Resolved Issues

View the resolved issues for a specific Platform release.

Go to download resolved issues by patch release.

Browse release notes for a selected Pega Version.

NOTE: Enter just the Case ID number (SR or INC) in order to find the associated Support Request.

Please note: beginning with the Pega Platform 8.7.4 Patch, the Resolved Issues have moved to the Support Center.

SR-C8467 · Issue 349659

Support added for Cassandra on SunOS

Resolved in Pega Version 7.4

Changes have been made to startup scripts and lz jar version in order to support C* on SunOS.

SR-C8702 · Issue 349662

Fixed cataloging for framework hotfixes with non-java code

Resolved in Pega Version 7.4

The system was unable to catalog Strategic Application hotfixes that included non-java code instances (e.g. .xml or .properties files) due to Framework hotfixes using a different version format that caused validation failure. To correct this, the system will bypass redundant release version validation for Strategic Application hotfixes so that it can catalog non-java code instances.

SR-C8702 · Issue 344809

Fixed cataloging for framework hotfixes with non-java code

Resolved in Pega Version 7.4

The system was unable to catalog Strategic Application hotfixes that included non-java code instances (e.g. .xml or .properties files) due to Framework hotfixes using a different version format that caused validation failure. To correct this, the system will bypass redundant release version validation for Strategic Application hotfixes so that it can catalog non-java code instances.

SR-B47858 · Issue 304348

Access Group Guardrail warning removed from password change

Resolved in Pega Version 7.4

Changing the password for the '[email protected]' operator generated the warning: 'The same Access Group should not be shared by Operators and Requestor Types. Access group PRPC:Agents was also referenced by Requestor Type DATA-ADMIN-REQUESTOR PRPC!BATCH'. The password change did take effect as expected. This guardrail warning was shown if the Access group used by the [email protected] operator, i.e. PRPC:Agents, was specified in any of Data-Admin-Requestor instance, and has been resolved by removing the unnecessary check.

SR-B96972 · Issue 343423

Specification rule save-as loads requirements

Resolved in Pega Version 7.4

While doing 'Save As' of a Specification rule from a locked ruleset version to a higher unlocked version of the ruleset, the linked Requirements were not shown in the Requirements section under the Details tab. Sometimes a refresh would show the requirements, but intermittently an exception would be generated. This was traced to the system not auto-populating the requirements list on 'save as' of the specification, and code has been added to PostActionSaveAs of the 'Rule-Application-UseCase' class to populate the Requirements link on 'save as' of this rule.

INC-126129 · Issue 569667

PropertyToColumnMap made more robust

Resolved in Pega Version 8.2.8

The DF_ProcessEmails dataflow was intermittently failing with a StageException error. This was traced to schema changes being propagated asynchronously by system pulse, which seem to have caused PropertyToColumnMap to cache stale schema. To resolve this, if the property mapping is not found the first time, the system will make a second attempt to get the mapping. Additional logging has also been added for better diagnostics.

INC-126319 · Issue 566343

Able to add offer to Change Request after deleting other offer from the landing page

Resolved in Pega Version 8.2.8

A Change Request creation was failing after deleting an offer rule from the revision management landing page. While deleting the offer rule, the activity pyDeleteRuleFromLP is called and pxDeleteRecord API is used to delete the rule. The pyWorkPage is being modified with class Work-ProjectManagement-CheckIn when the pxDeleteRecord activity is executed, but after this, the Change Request creation failed due to the wrong context of the pyWorkPage. This has been resolved by adding Page-New of pyWorkPage conditionally.

INC-126801 · Issue 576324

Improved cleanup for adm_response_meta_info

Resolved in Pega Version 8.2.8

The adm_commitlog.adm_response_meta_info column family was growing, leading to gradual increase in CPU utilization on the ADM nodes over time. Investigation showed that the compaction on the adm_response_meta_info table was not being triggered by the ADM service, and the compaction did not remove rows that belonged to models that had been deleted. To resolve this, compaction of the adm_response_meta_info table has been moved from the ADM client nodes to the ADM service nodes, which will correctly trigger the compaction on a predefined schedule. The compaction logic has also been refactored to remove rows that belong to models that have been deleted.

INC-128342 · Issue 594184

Improved cleanup for adm_response_meta_info

Resolved in Pega Version 8.2.8

The adm_commitlog.adm_response_meta_info column family was growing, leading to gradual increase in CPU utilization on the ADM nodes over time. Investigation showed that the compaction on the adm_response_meta_info table was not being triggered by the ADM service, and the compaction did not remove rows that belonged to models that had been deleted. To resolve this, compaction of the adm_response_meta_info table has been moved from the ADM client nodes to the ADM service nodes, which will correctly trigger the compaction on a predefined schedule. The compaction logic has also been refactored to remove rows that belong to models that have been deleted.

INC-129212 · Issue 572541

Strategy restoration repaired

Resolved in Pega Version 8.2.8

Once a strategy was deleted, it could not be restored afterward and a validation error appeared. This was an issue with some rule components being erroneously marked as required, and has been corrected.

We'd prefer it if you saw us at our best.

Pega.com is not optimized for Internet Explorer. For the optimal experience, please use:

Close Deprecation Notice
Contact us