SR-116508 · Issue 170253
Large flow handling improved for IE8
Resolved in Pega Version 7.1.7
When opening a large flow in IE8 which includes multiple sub flows, a long-running script warning is displayed. This is caused by too many calls being executed at once on IE8, and has been remedied by turning on the asyncProcessing parameter for IE8.
SR-116818 · Issue 167121
Corrected swim lane routing with shapes
Resolved in Pega Version 7.1.7
While using swim lanes, adding shapes into the flow caused unexpected and random behavior of the process modeler including failure to return control to the user after saving. This error was related to routing handling when swim lanes are present, and has been corrected.
SR-117228 · Issue 168249
Resolved issues with Flow shapes distributed across Swim Lanes
Resolved in Pega Version 7.1.7
Pool size is maintained as both pixels and inches, but auto conversion was failing if the pool dimension was very large. This created an error where saving a flow rule could cause the pool to drastically shrink (for example, 20 inches becoming 20 pixels). In order to maintain the proper dimensions, a check has been added for pool and swimlane to ensure the proper inch/pixel conversions.
INC-203994 · Issue 698853
DSS added to handle merges with lower versions of Postgres
Resolved in Pega Version 8.7.1
After update, executing the batch campaign with volume constraint resulted in the second data flow DF_Wait failing with error message "ERROR: number of columns (1844) exceeds limit (1664)". This was due to the database set’s change (in 8.5) to use the database layer’s merge statement. Prior to that, the logic used "deletes and inserts". Depending on the version of Postsgres, the generated SQL statement for a merge statement is different. The “INSERT … ON CONFLICT … UPDATE” syntax is generated for Postgres 9.5+ AND when there is a PK constraint defined for the DB table. Otherwise, the complex UPSERT statement (old syntax) is generated, as was the case in this issue. This is a known issue in the Postgres server software where it mis-interprets the number of columns involved. i.e., it mistakenly counts the number of columns twice. As a result, the actual maximum columns allowed is only half of the official limit (1664). The same UPSERT statement does not cause the “exceeds limit” exception if there are 832 or fewer columns in the statement. To resolve this, an option has been provided to select between the “original logic” (deletes and inserts) and the “merge statements” logic by way of the DSS “decision/datasets/db/useMergeStatementForUpdates”. Setting “true” will use the merge statement logic, and setting “false” will use deletes and inserts. When the DSS is not defined, the default is "true" and the system will use merge statements in the form preferred by Postgres 9.5+.
INC-180246 · Issue 699700
Support for apostrophe added to keyword tokenization
Resolved in Pega Version 8.7.1
A keyword containing an apostrophe was not detected properly in Text extraction model. This has been resolved by updating the annotator used in the tokenization.
INC-193399 · Issue 688115
DSS added to handle merges with lower versions of Postgres
Resolved in Pega Version 8.7.1
After update, executing the batch campaign with volume constraint resulted in the second data flow DF_Wait failing with error message "ERROR: number of columns (1844) exceeds limit (1664)". This was due to the database set’s change (in 8.5) to use the database layer’s merge statement. Prior to that, the logic used "deletes and inserts". Depending on the version of Postsgres, the generated SQL statement for a merge statement is different. The “INSERT … ON CONFLICT … UPDATE” syntax is generated for Postgres 9.5+ AND when there is a PK constraint defined for the DB table. Otherwise, the complex UPSERT statement (old syntax) is generated, as was the case in this issue. This is a known issue in the Postgres server software where it mis-interprets the number of columns involved. i.e., it mistakenly counts the number of columns twice. As a result, the actual maximum columns allowed is only half of the official limit (1664). The same UPSERT statement does not cause the “exceeds limit” exception if there are 832 or fewer columns in the statement. To resolve this, an option has been provided to select between the “original logic” (deletes and inserts) and the “merge statements” logic by way of the DSS “decision/datasets/db/useMergeStatementForUpdates”. Setting “true” will use the merge statement logic, and setting “false” will use deletes and inserts. When the DSS is not defined, the default is "true" and the system will use merge statements in the form preferred by Postgres 9.5+.
INC-193632 · Issue 679172
Cassandra driver metrics exposed for performance troubleshooting
Resolved in Pega Version 8.7.1
By default Cassandra driver metrics are now enabled. Metrics can be disabled by setting the dnode/disable_driver_metrics prconfig parameter.
INC-193847 · Issue 695974
DSS added to allow masking of subjectID in alerts
Resolved in Pega Version 8.7.1
In order to allow customizing whether or not a subjectID is included in alerts, a DSS has been added to conditionally mask the subjectID from being logged. To use this, set the "alerts/maskIHsubjectID" DSS in the Pega-DecisionEngine ruleset to true to hide the pySubjectID.
INC-194810 · Issue 691884
Removed services check and added warnings for simulations
Resolved in Pega Version 8.7.1
Attempting to run an audience simulation resulted in the error "Running simulations is not possible, because the required services are not available. Contact your system administrator to enable the data flow and real-time data grid services". Investigation showed the @DsmServices.pxHasFunctionalNodes("DataFlow","Batch") function call contained in the 'when' rule pyUnavailableDecisionServices was returning false even if all the nodes were in the cluster and all the DSM Services were in NORMAL status. To resolve this, the services check has been disabled and the simulation run will show a warning or fail if a data flow run is queued for more than 30 secs or if there is an issue with querying the underlying metrics storage.
INC-195197 · Issue 692147
Warnings added to prevent empty StrategyResult page
Resolved in Pega Version 8.7.1
When a Proposition Filter rule refers to a When rule that has "StrategyResult" declared in Pages & Classes but no "Param.StrategyResult", a design time warning will appear to indicate that this might cause discrepancy in globally optimized strategy (GOS) execution. * The warning message for a When rule with StrategyResult in Pages & Classes but not in Parameters: When rule [WhenClass: WhenName] does not have proper mapping for [StrategyResult] page. This would result in an empty [StrategyResult] page being passed into the When rule during execution. Please go to [WhenClass: WhenName] and add [StrategyResult] in the Parameters list and configure the mapping properly on Proposition Filter rule. * The warning message when StrategyResult is not in Pages & Classes but in Parameters list: When rule [WhenClass: WhenName] declares [StrategyResult] in Parameters tab, but isn't used in the conditions. This would affect performance during execution. Please remove the parameter from When rule [WhenClass: WhenName], and remove the Parameter mapping from the corresponding Proposition Filter criteria.