Skip to main content

Resolved Issues

View the resolved issues for a specific Platform release.

Go to download resolved issues by patch release.

Browse release notes for a selected Pega Version.

NOTE: Enter just the Case ID number (SR or INC) in order to find the associated Support Request.

Please update your bookmarks. This site will be discontinued in Dec 2024.

Pega Platform Resolved Issues for 8.1 and newer are now available on the Support Center.

INC-159216 · Issue 638931

DSS added to create consistent handling of longform datetime

Resolved in Pega Version 8.4.5

After upgrade, a difference in handling related to datetime value was seen. For example, EmailSchedRunEndDate is a date type property holding the value "20201016T000000.000 GMT"; in Pega v7.4, a substring function was used to move the extra characters from the date field ex. EmailSchedRunStartDate = @substring(.EmailSchedRunStartDate,0,8), but in Pega v8.4 and higher the long datetime value ( "20201016T000000.000 GMT") was still being used for the date field. This long value was then truncated to 2020101+ when saving to the database, causing errors in later steps. However, research found that if there is a call @toDate function before this step for any other field, the correct date value was set for EmailSchedRunStartDate. While ClipboardPages separate Dates and DateTimes, internally, in Java, both have a time component. The implementation of DSMClipboardPage made no difference for serialization and appended the time component for pure Date properties. To create consistent handling, an update has been made to optionally set the correct behavior after setting the Dynamic System Setting by way of "Pega-DecisionEngine dsm/clipboard/correctDateFormat -> true". This setting would only take effect after a restart of Pega, and the default is false in order to not disrupt any application inadvertently relying on this behavior.

INC-159332 · Issue 629617

Logic updated for finding 'Last' in Interaction History

Resolved in Pega Version 8.4.5

The 'LastReponseDate' and 'LastInteractionId' in the Interaction History summary data set were null. Investigation showed that reusing the ESM component in the aggregation dataset caused any assumptions made during the optimization of ESM to not be true anymore. To resolve this, the logic of the Last aggregation has been modified to not rely on a Last event which might not be stored in-state (such as optimization), but rather to use the list of events which is always stored.

INC-160277 · Issue 628158

Implementation updated to ensure consistent compareDatesByDays results

Resolved in Pega Version 8.4.5

When using compareDatesByDays in a filter shape within a strategy, the results of the expression were different between the expression test and the strategy test run. This was traced to a difference in handling that became visible after upgrade; giving a negative number for the numberOfDays parameter worked differently in v7.4 than in v8.4. The SSA implementation of compareDatesByDays always worked with the absolute difference in days between dates, whereas the Java function in Pega used in expressions did not, and would compare negative differences as well. To restore the expected behavior, the SSA implementation has been adjusted to not work with absolute differences, and tests have been added to ensure equal results for the Java function in Pega and the SSA implementation.

INC-165513 · Issue 645684

Queue Processors made more robust

Resolved in Pega Version 8.4.5

After upgrade, multiple queue processors were not running as expected. Attempting to restart them generated an error. Investigation showed that the real time data flow runs were not picking up or accepting assignments because the local node was under the impression it was still processing data. In this case, the need to synchronize the state of multiple threads caused the queue processors to become stuck in an initializing state due to a race condition that caused the data flow engine to think this run still had threads running when all threads were already stopped. To resolve this, the callback handling has been simplified and made more robust. In addition, in some cases the data flow leader node would believe the service nodes did not accept assignments even when they did. This occurred if many runs and nodes were involved, and was traced to an implicit limit on the NativeSQL query used to read the data to see which assignments were accepted. To resolve this, the key-value store in the Service Registry has been modified to allow a query of more than 500 entries at once.

INC-165704 · Issue 639503

VBD data flow timeout increased and made configurable

Resolved in Pega Version 8.4.5

Intermittent VBD timeouts were seen when writing records to MSK even though no errors were reported on the MSK side. Analysis showed that while batch data flows retry when a timeout occurs, real time data flows do not retry and the configuration to wait up to 10 seconds for an acknowledgement may not be sufficient depending on the system conditions. This has been resolved by increasing the default timeout to 20 seconds and adding a configurable timeout "vbd/streamPublishTimeoutMillis" to allow a customized setting.

INC-167334 · Issue 639316

GRS support added for Kafka Key password

Resolved in Pega Version 8.4.5

An enhancement has been added to support using GRS to set values for the Kafka Key password dynamically.

INC-169125 · Issue 642399

Nodes resume correctly after DDS restart

Resolved in Pega Version 8.4.5

A corner case issue in VBD's code for handling a DDS session was preventing the nodes from recovering correctly after a system shutdown. As part of the process for an event which fires if all DDS nodes are taken down or as part of a switch from embedded to external Cassandra, VBD's cache is invalidated and then re-initialized once new VBD API calls are received or on the VBD service pulse. In this case, the invalidation of the cache did not complete due to logic in the VBD code that can lead to executing a Cassandra query that will not work in the case of all DDS nodes being down. This has been resolved by modifying the handling of a session change event to eliminate inadvertent Cassandra queries so the invalidation can complete correctly and continue the re-initialization process.

INC-169544 · Issue 649540

Enhancement for MaxEnt modeling data

Resolved in Pega Version 8.4.5

An enhancement has been added to create output for the model coefficients, the term frequency, and the inverse term frequency for use in maximum entropy modeling. For MRM processes, every Maximum Entropy (Maxent) based topic model will contain two additional stats resources. These resources can be used to validate and replicate running of topic model outside of Pega. The resources are: 1) Term Frequency file – A CSV file with all words used for training and their cumulative frequency across training set. File name format – TRAINING_DATA_TERM_FREQUENCY_< RandomNumber >.csv olumns – Word, Count 2) Coefficient file – A CSV file with all features (words, taxonomy matches and category matches) and model learnt weights for each topic across training set. File name format – MAXENT_COEFFICIENT_VALUE.csv Columns – Feature, < TopicName1 >, < TopicName2 > ,…, < TopicNameK >

INC-170721 · Issue 658961

Stricter criteria set for reusing an SSAExecutionContext

Resolved in Pega Version 8.4.5

After a Strategy was configured with an existing Proposition Filter and the Explain Results box was unchecked, executing the strategy resulted in the error "Stack is empty, cannot pop any more frames". Investigation showed that the SSAExecutionContext object was reused across the two criteria evaluation in Proposition Filter rule: this works well as long as the input is the same across the two evaluations. However, the SSAExecutionContext object also stashed a reference to a PublicAPI object which became stale in the second evaluation and caused the empty stack issue for the given scenario. This has been resolved by providing stricter criteria in deciding when an SSAExecutionContext can be reused or not in the case of Proposition Filter rule.

INC-171594 · Issue 656185

Spell check correctly applied to email body

Resolved in Pega Version 8.4.5

Spell check was not being applied to email body for text analysis in Email Channel. This has been resolved to work irrespective of case.

We'd prefer it if you saw us at our best.

Pega.com is not optimized for Internet Explorer. For the optimal experience, please use:

Close Deprecation Notice
Contact us